All the text and images were created from Casa do Código book
Focusing on what Agile is here, on legal implementations is following the XP book, Scrum as it is a fact each Agile implementation taught the most detailed step-by-step (in love with XP).
Project is a marathon not a sprint, so it's best to run with cadence to reach the end of the marathon.
XP, Scrum, Lean Software Development, BDD, DDD, TDD, Automated Testing, Kanban, Planning Poker, Solving Technical Debts, Refactoring (to database), Clean Code, Continuous Delivery and DevOPS, Reading About Software Development, Craftsmanship of Software.
Not agile but cool: PMBOK, Traditional project management is based on the ten areas of PMBOK, which offer decades of experience in a framework that is practiced on a large scale by governments, large companies, and especially by other areas of knowledge where it is still the only and best way to manage projects
About TDD it's nice to read the book to understand best practices for each one and if it will apply to me
Here he gives all his motivation, as it was before and he was unmotivated until he discovered Agile. Then he ends up going into more detail on the motivations for agile and an introduction to the book such as:
But, after all, what is Agile? Is it a methodology? A process? A set of values? A manifesto? Tools? Practices? A move?
He starts by giving an example of how waterfall fucked up the life of the girl who threw 8 months of work away, then he said how agile came to solve this.
Here I can do something similar, explaining my case to myself
Here is telling where it came from, it's kind of cool to copy because it's history and take what's on the site itself to make your own interpretation
Here it basically talks about what they all have in common and gives examples like:
Scrum, Extreme Programming (XP), Crystal Clear and Feature Driven Development are examples of agile methods. Each of them brings a different approach that includes different values, practices and meetings.
Explaining the focus of each one, not that one replaces the other but that each one has a specific focus. Basically say the same, probably have to come back here later.